Filipić, Slavica

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
fda351ce-65e7-4390-be63-920d5d8d1cae
  • Filipić, Slavica (1)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

Identifying the CmbT substrates specificity by using a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) study

Filipić, Brankica; Nikolić, Katarina; Filipić, Slavica; Jovčić, Branko; Agbaba, Danica; Antić-Stanković, Jelena; Kojić, Milan; Golić, Nataša

(Elsevier Science Bv, Amsterdam, 2014)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Filipić, Brankica
AU  - Nikolić, Katarina
AU  - Filipić, Slavica
AU  - Jovčić, Branko
AU  - Agbaba, Danica
AU  - Antić-Stanković, Jelena
AU  - Kojić, Milan
AU  - Golić, Nataša
PY  - 2014
UR  - https://imagine.imgge.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/740
UR  - http://intor.torlakinstitut.com/handle/123456789/838
AB  - The CmbT substrate specificity and its role as a proton motive force-driven drug efflux pump at a molecular level were investigated in the study. In that order, 3D-quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) study was applied for selection of molecular determinants of multidrug recognition by CmbT. CmbT multidrug resistance protein of Lactococcus lactis contributes to extruding the structurally, chemically, and pharmacologically diverse range of substrates out of bacterial cells. This function of CmbT may result in the failure of antibiotic therapy. Homology model of CmbT protein was constructed and further opthnized. The 3D-QSAR model predictive potential was proved by use of leave-one-out cross validation Of the training set (Q(2): 0.69, R-observd(2) (vs).(Predicted) : 0.918, RMSEE: 0.193) and verification set (R-Observed vs predicted(2) : 0.704, RMSEP: 0.289). The results obtained in this study showed that high CmbT affinities to ethidium, sulbactam, and sulfathiazole could be related to the absence of significant unfavourable interactions. In contrast, the presence of specific unfavourable interaction between two hydrogen bond donor groups in bacitracin, apramycin, novobiocin, vancomycin, kanamycin, gentamycin, and tobramycin is found to be the main reason for their lower CmbT affinities. In addition, membrane position of the CmbT binding site and positive correlation between substrates lipophilicity (log D-PH so) and CmbT affinity strongly indicates that CmbT recognizes its substrates within the membrane.
PB  - Elsevier Science Bv, Amsterdam
T2  - Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers
T1  - Identifying the CmbT substrates specificity by using a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) study
EP  - 771
IS  - 3
SP  - 764
VL  - 45
DO  - 10.1016/j.jtice.2013.09.033
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Filipić, Brankica and Nikolić, Katarina and Filipić, Slavica and Jovčić, Branko and Agbaba, Danica and Antić-Stanković, Jelena and Kojić, Milan and Golić, Nataša",
year = "2014",
abstract = "The CmbT substrate specificity and its role as a proton motive force-driven drug efflux pump at a molecular level were investigated in the study. In that order, 3D-quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) study was applied for selection of molecular determinants of multidrug recognition by CmbT. CmbT multidrug resistance protein of Lactococcus lactis contributes to extruding the structurally, chemically, and pharmacologically diverse range of substrates out of bacterial cells. This function of CmbT may result in the failure of antibiotic therapy. Homology model of CmbT protein was constructed and further opthnized. The 3D-QSAR model predictive potential was proved by use of leave-one-out cross validation Of the training set (Q(2): 0.69, R-observd(2) (vs).(Predicted) : 0.918, RMSEE: 0.193) and verification set (R-Observed vs predicted(2) : 0.704, RMSEP: 0.289). The results obtained in this study showed that high CmbT affinities to ethidium, sulbactam, and sulfathiazole could be related to the absence of significant unfavourable interactions. In contrast, the presence of specific unfavourable interaction between two hydrogen bond donor groups in bacitracin, apramycin, novobiocin, vancomycin, kanamycin, gentamycin, and tobramycin is found to be the main reason for their lower CmbT affinities. In addition, membrane position of the CmbT binding site and positive correlation between substrates lipophilicity (log D-PH so) and CmbT affinity strongly indicates that CmbT recognizes its substrates within the membrane.",
publisher = "Elsevier Science Bv, Amsterdam",
journal = "Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers",
title = "Identifying the CmbT substrates specificity by using a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) study",
pages = "771-764",
number = "3",
volume = "45",
doi = "10.1016/j.jtice.2013.09.033"
}
Filipić, B., Nikolić, K., Filipić, S., Jovčić, B., Agbaba, D., Antić-Stanković, J., Kojić, M.,& Golić, N.. (2014). Identifying the CmbT substrates specificity by using a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) study. in Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers
Elsevier Science Bv, Amsterdam., 45(3), 764-771.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2013.09.033
Filipić B, Nikolić K, Filipić S, Jovčić B, Agbaba D, Antić-Stanković J, Kojić M, Golić N. Identifying the CmbT substrates specificity by using a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) study. in Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. 2014;45(3):764-771.
doi:10.1016/j.jtice.2013.09.033 .
Filipić, Brankica, Nikolić, Katarina, Filipić, Slavica, Jovčić, Branko, Agbaba, Danica, Antić-Stanković, Jelena, Kojić, Milan, Golić, Nataša, "Identifying the CmbT substrates specificity by using a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) study" in Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 45, no. 3 (2014):764-771,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2013.09.033 . .
1
2
2