Show simple item record

dc.creatorMihailović, Jelena
dc.creatorProdić, Ivana
dc.creatorSmiljanić, Katarina
dc.creatorĆirković-Veličković, Tanja
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-09T13:24:31Z
dc.date.available2023-10-09T13:24:31Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.isbn978-86-7031-511-2
dc.identifier.urihttp://intor.torlakinstitut.com/handle/123456789/770
dc.description.abstractIntroduction. Peanut allergy affects a large portion of world population causing reactions rangingfrom mild to severe. Major peanut allergen IgE epitopes are well characterized but little is knownabout their post-translational modifications (PTM) and how they are affected by thermaltreatment. PTM profile may differ between raw and thermally treated peanut, which could affectits allergic potential depending on type, size and position of modifications.Objective. Our aim was to analyse and compare PTM profiles of 4 major peanut allergens - Ara h 1,Ara h 2, Ara h 3 and Ara h 6, as well as their amounts in raw and roasted samples using bottom-upproteomics methods.Methodology. Full peanut protein extracts (both thermally treated and non-treated) were digestedin gel and in solution, and analysed by a Top10 nLC-MS/MS method by LTQ Orbitrap XL (ThermoFisher Scientific Inc., Germany). Within the extracts major allergens - Ara h 1, Ara h 2, Ara h 3 andAra h 6 were identified, label free quantified (LFQ) and searched for PTMs by Peaks X software(Bioinformatics solutions Inc.I, Canada). Epitope sequences were acquired from the ImmuneEpitope Database (IEDB www.iedb.org).Main findings. LFQ results show that there is no significant change in the amountsof any of thestudied allergens between raw and roasted extracts.Out of the 4 allergens Ara h 6 is modified in thehighest portion, with respect to the protein size: 15% and 12% of its positions are modified in rawand roasted sample, respectively. Total of 21 modifications were quantified between the twopreparations, with oxidation (M), methylation (K,R) and dethiomethylation affecting the largestnumber of peptides.Conclusions. Peanut allergen epitopes are indeed carriers of PTMs that differ in pattern andquantity between treated and non-treated extracts. The in silico discovered PTMs could affectprotein digestibility and allergenicity. Further investigation is necessary in order to fully understandthe impact protein modifications could have on their allergenic potential.sr
dc.language.isoensr
dc.publisherSerbian Proteomic Association - SePAsr
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Basic Research (BR or ON)/172024/RS//sr
dc.relationGhent University Global Campus, Belgian Special Research Fund BOF StG No. 01N01718.sr
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/810752/EU//sr
dc.rightsopenAccesssr
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceBook of Abstracts - V SePa Simposium: Proteomics in the analysis of food, environmental protection and medical research, Novi Sad 2019sr
dc.subjectmass spectrometry based bottom-up proteomicssr
dc.subjectPTMssr
dc.subjectLFQsr
dc.subjectrelative quantificationsr
dc.subjectallergenssr
dc.subjectpeanutsr
dc.titleComparative study of raw and thermally treated peanut major allergen post- translational modifications (PTMs)sr
dc.typeconferenceObjectsr
dc.rights.licenseBYsr
dc.citation.spage16/L10
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://intor.torlakinstitut.com/bitstream/id/1730/Comparative_study_of_raw_pub_2019.pdf
dc.identifier.rcubhttps://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_intor_770
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionsr


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record