Show simple item record

dc.creatorSpector, Novera Herbert
dc.creatorJovanova-Nešić, Katica
dc.creatorGertz, A.M.
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-18T10:40:51Z
dc.date.available2021-02-18T10:40:51Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn1874-6098
dc.identifier.urihttp://intor.torlakinstitut.com/handle/123456789/379
dc.description.abstractFirst, the latest scientific and clinical reports will be evaluated to separate the wheat from the chaff, that is, good data versus merely anecdotal evidence. Thus, the famous (infamous) Stromboli Cocktail will be brought up to date. Second, longevity statistics will be reviewed: Why do the most scientifically advanced countries have such low (comparatively) life expectancies? Scientific knowledge expands exponentially each decade, whereas there have been no significant advances in our knowledge, government, economics, politics, anti-corruption, and so forth since the dawn of history. What can we expect in the future? Will the human species outlive the cockroach? Can we expect to get closer to that theoretical asymptote of 120 years of human life? Will this ceiling ever be lifted? Finally, we offer two vital challenges to scientists of today.en
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.sourceCurrent Aging Science
dc.subjectAgingen
dc.subjectCanceren
dc.subjectFuture of clinical medicineen
dc.subjectIatrogenic medicineen
dc.subjectLife expectancyen
dc.subjectLongevityen
dc.subjectMedical malpracticeen
dc.subjectNosocomial medicineen
dc.subjectPineal hormonesen
dc.subjectStromboli cocktailen
dc.subjectThymusen
dc.titleAging, cancer, and longevity: The uncertain roaden
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseARR
dc.citation.epage91
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.other6(1): 86-91
dc.citation.spage86
dc.citation.volume6
dc.identifier.doi10.2174/1874609811306010011
dc.identifier.pmid23895525
dc.identifier.rcubconv_569
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84882777071
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record